Coach readVisit mygameplan.ai
Enzo Maresca, Chelsea 2024 to 2026, Manchester City 2026

What he took with him, and what he left at Stamford Bridge

Six weeks into the City job, the shape of Maresca's football is the one Chelsea knew: a back four that becomes a three and a two, full-backs who play as midfielders, wingers glued to the touchline. Two things are different already. The press has changed from man-for-man everywhere to Guardiola's zonal block with man-for-man jumps. And with Haaland in front of it, the team goes forward sooner.

Chelsea under MarescaManchester City under MarescaOpponent
Built from public match analysis of Chelsea (July 2024 to December 2025) and City's pre-season plus the first five competitive matches of 2026/27. Press play on any panel, or step through the phases.

Kept

  • 4-2-3-1 on paper, 3-2-5 with the ball
  • One full-back inverts, the other tucks in
  • Wingers isolate 1v1 out wide
  • A free No 10 between the lines
  • Rest defence: three plus the pivot behind the ball

Adapted

  • Press: man-for-man everywhere became a 4-2-4 zonal block with wide triggers
  • Goal kicks: the keeper as an extra centre-back became a 1-4-2-4 with the centre-backs split
  • Pace of attack: patient at Chelsea, direct sooner at City

New

  • A 3-1-6 that becomes 2-2-5-1 with both full-backs up
  • A No 9 who does not drop: Haaland pins, the runners go past him
  • A settled back four instead of 25 changes in 19 games
01

The shape with the ball: the part he brought in a suitcase

At both clubs the team lines up in a 4-2-3-1 and turns into a 3-2-5 the moment the ball settles. One full-back steps into midfield next to the pivot, the other tucks in beside the centre-backs, the wingers hold the touchline, and the No 10 plus one midfielder fill the half-spaces. City adds a second gear Chelsea rarely used: when the opponent defends with a back five, both full-backs go and the team becomes 3-1-6, then 2-2-5-1.

Chelsea Cucurella inverts, Gusto tucks in

Man City O'Reilly or Aït-Nouri inverts, Nunes tucks in

The idea behind the 3-2-5 is the same in both cities: six against a back five, three against a front two. Overload the last line so a winger is alone with a full-back, and keep one spare defender against the opponent's strikers so the ball can be recycled without risk. What City has that Chelsea did not is the option to send both full-backs and play 3-1-6, which Squawka picked up in pre-season. Chelsea nearly always kept one full-back home.

02

The full-back who is a midfielder

The signature role. At Chelsea, Cucurella was a No 6, a box-to-box midfielder and a left-back in the same match (124 touches against Aston Villa). At City the same job goes to Nico O'Reilly, a midfielder by trade, and to Aït-Nouri, while Matheus Nunes on the right can tuck in as a third centre-back or push on when the team goes 2-2-5-1.

Left side: the inverter

CucurellaO'Reilly, Aït-Nouri

Steps inside to join the pivot, or goes one line higher into the pocket while the pivot stays fixed. Expected to finish attacks in the box like a No 8. Same role, same freedom, at both clubs.

Right side: the tucker

GustoNunes

Slides in beside the centre-backs to make the three. Chelsea stopped there. City's version can also go: with both full-backs advanced, the two central midfielders become the two behind a front six.

The No 10

PalmerCherki

Free between the lines, drifting wide when the full-back inverts so the midfield diamond stretches rather than clogs. Palmer ranked second in the league for through balls in this role. Cherki started the derby there.

The wingers

Madueke, Neto, SanchoDoku, Semenyo

Touchline, always. The whole shape exists to leave them 1v1. Semenyo gave four assists in three pre-season matches from that isolation; Doku is described as the perfect Maresca winger.

03

The winger 1v1: the same trap, a different striker

The mechanism is unchanged. Full-back inside, winger on the chalk, striker pinning the near centre-back. The opponent's full-back has to step out to stop the cross, and the half-space between him and his centre-back opens. What changes is who runs into it. At Chelsea, Jackson or João Pedro dropped to pull a centre-back and the gap was filled by a third-man run. At City, Haaland stays high and pins, and the runner is Cherki, the inverted full-back or the far winger.

Chelsea striker drops, third man runs

Man City striker pins, runners go past

This is the one place where the personnel changes the football rather than the other way round. Chelsea's chance creation depended on the striker's dropping movement to unlock the half-space; the analysis of his City side notes Haaland "is not used to these actions". Maresca has not asked him to learn them. The pinning does the same job, and the finishing is the upgrade: Chelsea scored 96 from 102 expected goals over his 18 months, City scored 115 from 104 last season.

Read your next opponent like thisBuild-up shapes, full-back roles and where the 1v1s come from, prepared from your own match data and video.
See opponent analysis
04

The press: the biggest change

Chelsea pressed man-for-man. Each player followed his opponent wherever he went, a full-back dropping to the corner flag took a Chelsea winger with him, and behind the press Maresca accepted 3v3 or 4v4. City does not do that. In settled phases City sits in the 4-2-4 zonal high block Guardiola left behind, and turns man-for-man only on a wide trigger: the winger jumps onto the centre-back, the two front players screen the pivot, the ball-side full-back jumps onto his full-back, and the defence shuffles across. The free man is left on the far side, where the pass is hardest.

Chelsea man-for-man, follow anywhere

Man City zonal block, man-for-man on the trigger

Passes allowed per defensive action (lower = more aggressive)

Chelsea, Maresca10.7
City, Guardiola11.6
City, Marescafive games, too early

Premier League, 1 July 2024 to 30 December 2025 for the two full seasons. Chelsea were also second in the league for challenge intensity in Maresca's first autumn while only twelfth for PPDA: the press was about winning the ball back immediately, not about sustained height.

Where the two versions meet

Restart presschanged

Chelsea pressed goal kicks with the front four and men behind attached. City presses restarts passively: the front four block the middle, the opponent is invited to clip to a full-back or go long into an underloaded front line, and only behind the front four is it man-oriented.

After losing itkept

Both versions counter-press with the four nearest players for a few seconds, then drop into shape if the ball is not won. Rúben Dias after the derby: the details of how City press and defend "are Enzo's idea".

How does your next opponent press?A ready-made pressing report: triggers, shape and the free man, for any team in your league.
See the pressing report
05

Goal kicks: from an eleventh outfielder to a 1-4-2-4

Chelsea built from restarts with Sánchez stepping out as an auxiliary centre-back, a centre-back sliding wide and the pivot dropping between the two centre-backs to drag a striker. City starts differently: the centre-backs split either side of Donnarumma, the double pivot stays deep, the full-backs push high, and the front four stay high. The opponent then chooses between letting City build short or leaving a 4v4 at the top of the pitch.

Chelsea keeper joins, pivot drops

Man City 1-4-2-4, then short or long

Goal kicks, long or short?See where your opponent's restarts go and how they build from the back.
See the goal-kick report
06

Tempo: the patient team that learned to run

The surprise in Chelsea's numbers is how much of their damage came on the break. For a side averaging 57.5% possession they were second in the league for fast-break shots and for direct attacks, and the Club World Cup final against PSG, absorbed and then hit at 3-0, was that Chelsea. Maresca arrives at a City that had itself turned more direct in Guardiola's last season, and he has said the plan is to be direct sooner once territory is won.

159
Fast-break shots
Chelsea, Maresca's 18 months. Second in the Premier League.
756
Direct attacks
Second in the league over the same period, for a team third for possession.
127
Through balls, City 2025/26
A club record, up 50%. The squad he inherits already plays the more vertical game he wants.

Possession

Chelsea, Maresca57.5%
City, Guardiola60.5%
City v Inter, pre-season64%

Share of passes played forward

Chelsea, Maresca29.3%
City, Guardiola25.2%

Chelsea already passed forward more often than Guardiola's City. Expect Maresca's City to sit between the two: the same careful first phase, then earlier balls into Haaland and the wingers.

07

What he left behind, and why it may not follow him

Chelsea's problems in Maresca's last autumn were not in the drawing. The system created chances to the end (3-0 against Barcelona in November, a 1-1 with ten men against Arsenal). The leaks were execution: a back four that never settled, indiscipline, mistakes, and set pieces.

25
Back-four changes in 19 league games
Injuries, rotation and a deep young squad. City runs a smaller, older group.
142
Yellow cards
Plus 41 errors leading to shots and 18 to goals over his tenure.
20
Points dropped from winning positions
2025/26, all competitions, by the time he left in January.

Set-piece defending was the most repeated criticism: near-post marking on corners, and goals conceded from throw-ins against Bournemouth, Sunderland and Brentford. Nothing in City's first five matches says whether that has been fixed, because nobody has scored against them from a set piece yet. It is the first thing to check when they concede.

08

The ledger

Base shape4-2-3-1, almost exclusively, to keep Palmer at 104-2-3-1, Cherki at 10, Anderson and Fernández the pairKept
Shape with the ball3-2-5, one full-back inverts, one stays3-2-5, plus 3-1-6 and 2-2-5-1 with both full-backs upExtended
Full-backsCucurella and Gusto as midfieldersO'Reilly, Aït-Nouri and Nunes in the same rolesKept
WingersTouchline, 1v1 isolationTouchline, 1v1 isolation: Doku, SemenyoKept
StrikerDrops to drag a centre-back, third man runsHaaland pins, does not drop; runners go past himNew
Settled pressMan-for-man, follow anywhere, 3v3 behind it4-2-4 zonal block, man-for-man on wide triggers, free man far sideChanged
Restart pressActive with the front fourPassive front four blocking the middle, man-oriented behindChanged
Own goal kicksKeeper as extra centre-back, pivot drops between the two1-4-2-4, centre-backs split, short or long depending on the pressChanged
Counter-pressFour nearest players for a few seconds, then dropSameKept
TempoPatient, 11-second sequences, then lethal on the breakDirect sooner once territory is wonAdapted
Squad handlingHeavy rotation, 25 back-four changes in 19Two changes in the derby with ten men; same eleven pattern so farNew
Watch for: the trigger press under pressureWhen City are chasing a game, does the zonal block hold, or does Maresca go back to the Chelsea version and press man-for-man everywhere? The Community Shield against Arsenal (0-3) is the only time he has been behind for long.
Watch for: the first set-piece goal againstChelsea's near-post and throw-in problems were structural. Whether City's set-piece coach or Maresca owns that phase will show in the first concession.
Watch for: Haaland droppingIf Haaland starts coming short to drag a centre-back, Maresca has chosen his Chelsea mechanism over the pin. Nothing in five matches suggests it.
Watch for: both full-backs upThe 3-1-6 appeared in pre-season against back fives. Its first league use against a five will say whether it is a plan or a friendly experiment.
MyGamePlan

Want reads like this on your next opponent?

MyGamePlan turns your match data and video into reads like this one, for opponent analysis, your own team and player development. Used by clubs such as KRC Genk, Malmö FF, QPR and Real Salt Lake.