Nottingham Forest's 2025-26 season has been one of the most surprising developments in recent Premier League history. A team that finished outside Europe just 12 months ago is now competing for Champions League qualification. What does the data say about their turnaround?
The Setup
Forest came into the season with a clear new direction under their manager. The recruitment was sharp, the tactical identity was defined, and the player integration was swift. But numbers tell the story better than narratives.
What Changed Defensively
The most obvious area of improvement: defensive solidity. Forest moved from a high-press, aggressive defensive posture to one that emphasizes shape and transition control.
- Defending transitions: 5 fewer shots against per 90 minutes compared to 2024-25
- Set piece efficiency: Tighter zoning on corners, reducing dangerous situations by 12%
- Ball recovery speed: Average recovery distance reduced from 28m to 22m, meaning presses are tighter
Their defensive organization is measurably sharper. But the biggest factor isn't one stat: it's consistency. They're defending the same way every week, which allows opponents less time to adjust.
Going Forward
Offensively, Forest made a calculated choice: more direct transitions, fewer sideways passes. This improved their xG output significantly:
- Progressive pass success rate: Up 8% (more penetrative passing)
- Transition to shot: Reduced from 12 seconds to 8 seconds average
- xG per 90: Increased from 1.4 to 1.8
They're not dominating possession, and that's intentional. They're using possession more efficiently, which is what matters.
Individual Standouts
Two player signings have been particularly impactful. A midfielder brought in for organization and one attacking player for efficiency. The data shows both have integrated seamlessly: they're executing the tactical principles with minimal adjustment period.
The Sustainability Question
The real test: can this level of performance be sustained? Historically, sudden improvements can be fluky. But Forest's data suggests this is built on solid principles, not luck. Their underlying stats are strong. Their tactical identity is clear. Their execution is repeatable.
Whether they maintain top-four contention comes down to injury management and whether competing on multiple fronts (league, European, domestic cup) can be balanced. The data alone can't predict that. Only the next six months can.
Want to analyze team performance like this for your club? Book a call.
.png)

.jpg)